This process assumes something starts the the nuclear reaction in the absence of radiation. If the nuclear reactions can be started without radiation, why would it need radiation to continue. Also, nano- particles are seldom present in significant amounts. Consequently, I see no reason why this effect would apply to LENR.

Ed Storms
On May 15, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Axil Axil wrote:

4. Does radiation emitted from the nuclear process fuel additional nuclear reactions?

Nano-particles convert radiation into heat which then increases the activity of polaritons which then produces more EMF concentration which produces more LENR.


On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
3. Can application of energy from any outside source trigger LENR?

Polaritons can convert heat energy into EMF concentrations through the action of nano-lensing.


On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: 1. Can energy be concentrated within a material by a spontaneous process?

A nano-particle(s) can concentrate EMF power to a level of tens of terawatts/cm2. This concentration is long lasting, that is, not pulsed.

That is close to what the National ignition facility can do.


On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Eric Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Ed,

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Edmund Storms <[email protected]> wrote:

1. Can energy be concentrated within a material by a spontaneous process?
2. Can this local energy initiate a nuclear reaction?
3. Can application of energy from any outside source trigger LENR?
4. Does radiation emitted from the nuclear process fuel additional nuclear reactions?
5. Does energetic helium (alpha) result from LENR?

I have no issue with item (1). I'm just starting to pay more attention to the question of x-rays, that's all. Unless we're talking about very strong x-rays, I don't think we can conclude much if anything their presence or absence, and particularly in connection with excess heat, without putting some kind of x-ray sensitive film in the system (like they did at BARC).

Apart from the small side detail concerning x-rays, I am not disputing your analysis of the likelihood of accelerating electrons to the point of triggering a new kind of electron capture.

Eric





Reply via email to