On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Brad Lowe <ecatbuil...@gmail.com> wrote:
Available here: > http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3913 > After reading the report pretty closely, I am cautiously optimistic that things are proceeding very well. There were things that made me think that the report was not exactly publication-ready, but hopefully those things can be fixed. I am very interested to know if there are any debunkers here who wish to weigh in on the substance of this paper for all posterity and for all time? (If you must debunk, debunk subtly, so that we do not obviously break the rules.) Eric
