I've been seen some blogs that reported this paper. The most popular argument is that all this is a falsification for a scam.
2013/5/20 Eric Walker <[email protected]> > On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Brad Lowe <[email protected]> wrote: > > Available here: >> http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3913 >> > > After reading the report pretty closely, I am cautiously optimistic that > things are proceeding very well. There were things that made me think that > the report was not exactly publication-ready, but hopefully those things > can be fixed. > > I am very interested to know if there are any debunkers here who wish to > weigh in on the substance of this paper for all posterity and for all time? > (If you must debunk, debunk subtly, so that we do not obviously break the > rules.) > > Eric > > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]
