http://motls.blogspot.com/2013/05/tommaso-dorigo-impressed-by-cold-fusion.htmlMotl's
 critique seems to hinge on the actual output power being far less than the 
estimate.He asserts that the actual emissivity is far less than unity, and so 
it's reasonable to supposethat the actual output power is perhaps even less 
than the input power.Doesn't he have this backwards? At constant output power, 
as the emissivity reduces, output powerwill apparently reduce, meaning that 
what is measured is progressively less than what's actually output.Andrew

Reply via email to