http://motls.blogspot.com/2013/05/tommaso-dorigo-impressed-by-cold-fusion.htmlMotl's critique seems to hinge on the actual output power being far less than the estimate.He asserts that the actual emissivity is far less than unity, and so it's reasonable to supposethat the actual output power is perhaps even less than the input power.Doesn't he have this backwards? At constant output power, as the emissivity reduces, output powerwill apparently reduce, meaning that what is measured is progressively less than what's actually output.Andrew
- RE: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper ... Chris Zell
- Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper ... Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper ... Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem Akira Shirakawa
- Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem Michele Comitini
- Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem Michele Comitini
- Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem Eric Walker
- Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem Jouni Valkonen
- Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem Eric Walker
- Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem Andrew
- Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem Giovanni Santostasi
- Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem Andrew
- Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper ... Andrew
- Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper ... Jed Rothwell
- RE: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper ... DJ Cravens
- Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper ... Andrew
- Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper ... Andrew
- Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper ... Andrew

