I said it was a moot point [1] ... and I have no interest in "injuring" the list. And, nope, I didn't get the news of the report here. All the same, I value this list and wouldn't want to see it interfered with which is why I asked Kevin and Bill to handle it without me getting Forbes' involved.
[m] [1] From http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/moot_point *moot <http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/moot> point<http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/point> * (*plural* *moot points <http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/moot_points#English> s* 1. ... 2. An issue regarded as potentially debatable, but no longer practically applicable. Although the idea may still be worth debating and exploring academically, and such discussion may be useful for addressing similar issues in the future, the idea has been rendered irrelevant for the present issue. On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Mark Gibbs <mgi...@gibbs.com> wrote: > > Terry, > > > > Thanks. The issue has become a moot point and Bill needn't bother. > > I really don't care what you do to the offender; but, injuring this > list is not in your best interest. After all, didn't you get the > original story here? > >
