I wrote: On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Duncan Cumming <[email protected]>wrote: > > I am not trying to assert anything as fact. I am merely pointing out >> that a simple diode inside the controller box (to which access was >> forbidden by Rossi) COULD HAVE given the observed results. I am NOT saying >> that it, in fact, did, merely speculating that it could have. >> > > Am I right in understanding that this line of reasoning requires tampering > with the mains itself, where the electrical measurements were made, in > addition to any sly customizations that might have been made at the > controller? >
I think I'm starting to understand. This is a separate line of reasoning to the one about the possibility of hidden DC and RF passing undetected through the clamp meters at the mains. In this line of reasoning, the duty cycle (35 percent ON) is misunderstood, and there is a hidden DC component from the controller delivering power to the E-Cat, but not above what was read from the wall -- am I describing this right? Eric
