The correct picture is here: http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/works-of-art/18.64.43
If this hypothesis is true, then the question is are the Professors all of them stupid or criminal? I see more and more as the partisan fantasy is the best weapon in the war against an inconvenient reality. Peter On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Claudio C Fiorini < [email protected]> wrote: > In Italy they are discussing another hypothesis regarding the input power: > > The hypothesis is, that the load (the three inputs of the black box) were > not connected between the phases and neutral, but between the phases. But, > at the same time, the tensions were measured (by error or to mislead) > between the phases and neutral. > > In this case, the PCE830 computer "sees" the following: > > 3 times 6 A current > 3 times about 230 V > > In reality, the power consumed was: > > 3 x 400 V x 6 A = 7200 W > with pf=0.5 we have: 3600 W > with 33.3% duty cycle we have 1200 continous power > > And that would be 3.3 times more then claimed, and would reduce the the so > called COP of this nuclear reactor for domestic use to under one. > > Some commentator here believes to have seen on a picture, that the wires > were in "trangolo" (triangle, between phases) and not "a stella" (star, > between phase and neutral). > > What we know from the picture (that was take for shure DURING the afaik > uninterrupted test), is that the tensions were measured between phase and > neutral. > > Lets start to confute this hypothesis.... > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
