He is the one accusing without proof. He is the one being libelous and anti ethical.
2013/5/28 Akira Shirakawa <shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com> > Hello group, > > It appears that this email by prof. Guglielmi of the University of Bath is > being circulated in several blogs. In short, the author wonders whether > Levi et al. did with their E-Cat investigation a good job from an ethical > point of view. I don't necessarily agree with the message, but I think it's > brave of him to put his real name (and those of a few supporters) on this. > History will tell whether he was right or not. > > http://cassandralegacy.**blogspot.com/2013/05/ethics-**of-e-cat.html<http://cassandralegacy.blogspot.com/2013/05/ethics-of-e-cat.html> > http://news.newenergytimes.**net/2013/05/27/scientific-** > ethics-of-e-cat-promoters-**questioned/<http://news.newenergytimes.net/2013/05/27/scientific-ethics-of-e-cat-promoters-questioned/> > http://ecatnews.com/?p=2545#**comment-50191<http://ecatnews.com/?p=2545#comment-50191> > http://wavewatching.net/**fringe/the-hot-cat-report/#**comment-5641<http://wavewatching.net/fringe/the-hot-cat-report/#comment-5641> > http://fusionefredda.**wordpress.com/2013/05/24/**vettore/#comment-21110<http://fusionefredda.wordpress.com/2013/05/24/vettore/#comment-21110>(original) > > >> -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
