Rossi confuses and annoys many people by being both open and secretive at the same time. Harry
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Andrew <andrew...@att.net> wrote: > ** > Nope. Had you been paying attention to the interviews with the testers, > you would have read that quote as #7 in a list of 7. As for the Rossi > quote, this has also been widespread. You couldn't make this stuff up. And > I didn't; I simply repeated written quotes. > > As for motives, you seem to miss the obvious one, but I won't speculate > about it publicly. Lord knows, that might be "libellous". > > Andrew > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 28, 2013 6:28 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Ethics of the E-Cat investigation put into question > > Andrew <andrew...@att.net> wrote: > > Rossi: The experimenters were free to use any test equipment of their >> choosing. >> Testers: That depends on Prof. Levi, who specifies the instrumentation. >> >> >> Yup, ethical as all get out. >> > > This seems to be a straight out assertion that Levi is lying, and that he > is in cahoots with Rossi. If that is your opinion you should say so. > > I think that borders on libel. I suggest you refrain from saying things > like that in this forum, unless you have some evidence. Rossi has done so > many odd things he makes anyone uncomfortable. It is hardly libelous to > point out that he is controversial and has been in trouble with the law. > But Levi has not done anything or said anything suspicious. You are saying, > in effect, that a professor is deliberately destroying his own reputation, > in a way that will certainly be discovered, with no possible benefit or > profit. This seems unlikely to me. > > - Jed > >
