this is not incompetence, this is risk analysis. Rossi knowing that the testers could measure something like DC of HF, could not have tried that trick.
maybe is this off your competence. Too much psychology... Magicians don't use a trick that can be easily found, and either : - they don't use that trick - they forbid the spectators to check that. so only question is whether the testers were allowed to see DC offset between phases. if yes, problem closed. HF above 30kHz is not a problem since it would be lost in the cables, and would have burned them, plus killed the plugge instruments. 2013/5/28 Andrew <andrew...@att.net> > ** > Incompetence is a wholly inadequate tool with which to rule out fraud. > > Andrew > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com> > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 28, 2013 9:04 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Ethics of the E-Cat investigation put into question > > > > 2013/5/28 Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > >> Andrew <andrew...@att.net> wrote: >> >> ** >>> Would you have us believe that the use of an oscilloscope and/or a >>> spectrum analyzer was *not* forbidden for these tests? >>> >> >> There were absolutely not forbidden. I have that from the horse's mouth. >> > > That is enough for me to trust all the paper not being a fraud. From some > comments (it is getting messy, and pathoskeptics abuse of lies published as > facts) I though that measuring socket voltage was forbidden. > > Even with wood instruments they would have proved that Rossi was no afraid > of people measuring DC or HF... That is enough to rule out fraud. > > end of the story, else is chatting. > >
