Why else would Rossi say that the output of his control box was a trade
secret?

A DC feed of a internal heater is not a trade secret.


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Arnaud Kodeck <arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be>wrote:

>  Axil,****
>
> I doubt that the actual design of the eCat is able to bring CB range
> signal from electrical heating system. Or where else ?****
>
> ** **
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* mercredi 29 mai 2013 22:08
> *To:* vortex-l
>
> *Subject:* Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Speculation about hotCat
> ****
>
>  ** **
>
> EMF simulation in the CB range will form nanoparticles (aka clusters).
> Potassium is the best candidate for the formation of dynamic NAE through
> nanoparticle formation when stimulated by EMF. ****
>
> ** **
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Arnaud Kodeck <arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be>
> wrote:****
>
> Ed,****
>
>  ****
>
> I think you forget to add the EM stimulation controlled by the black box
> between wall socket and the eCat.****
>
>  ****
>
> Arnaud****
>   ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Edmund Storms [mailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com]
> *Sent:* mercredi 29 mai 2013 21:53****
>
>
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Cc:* Edmund Storms****
>
> *Subject:* Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Speculation about hotCat****
>
>  ****
>
> Fran, I would not guess how Rossi bonds the powder to the wall, only that
> this must be done. A secret sauce is applied before the Ni is placed in the
> e-Cat in order to create the NAE. You need to identify how many additional
> secret sauces you think are involved. He also places a hydride in the tube
> to supply hydrogen. This material also might have an effect.  I suggest
> speculation about things we have no way of knowing is not productive. Let's
> discuss what is real and required by nature for the observed effect to be
> produced. ****
>
>  ****
>
> We know Rossi activates the Ni before it is used, i.e. creates the NAE.***
> *
>
> We know this powder must make good thermal contact with the wall.****
>
> We know that Ni powder sinters at the temperature being produced.****
>
> We know that the NAE is stable at these temperatures. ****
>
> We know that the generated power increases with increased temperature.
> Therefore, a positive feedback is operating.****
>
> We know that Rossi attempts to control this feedback by controlling the
> temperature.****
>
> We know that the power source responds rapidly to the external
> temperature. Therefore, good thermal contact exists between the source and
> the thermal sink. ****
>
> We can suspect that no additional source of energy or stimulation is
> applied to the power source other than temperature.****
>
>  ****
>
> These are the only facts I can identify. Did I miss anything?****
>
>  ****
>
> Ed Storms****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> On May 29, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Roarty, Francis X wrote:****
>
> ** **
>
> Ed,****
>
> you make a good case that something improves the thermal bond of the
> powder to the inner walls.. perhaps the function of the secret sauce.. I
> don’t recall the volume of the powder used but am under the impression it
> fills most of the reactor tube and therefore must also have good thermal
> bond through it’s own bulk to reach the reactor walls. I think the MAHG was
> a weak easily compromised cousin to this device with only a thin sputtered
> layer on the inner wall of the tube while Rossi has designed a way to stack
> NAE out into a bulk form away from the reactor wall.  I gathered from the
> thread that very little powder spilled out when they cut it open after
> destruction… so would assume the bonding held the powder inside as a foam
> or gelatinous solid? Can we assume the secret sauce must bind the powder
> into some form of solid. I am leaning toward an open foam like malted milk
> balls but a recent thread also suggested a gelatinous colloid.****
>
> Fran****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* Edmund Storms [mailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com<stor...@ix.netcom.com>
> ]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 29, 2013 11:43 AM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Cc:* Edmund Storms
> *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Speculation about hotCat****
>
>  ****
>
> Bob, this is a good analysis of a possible design.  You are right, the
> powder must make good thermal contact with the wall for the nuclear
> reaction to be controlled by temperature. Just how Rossi makes this happen
> is unknown.  Nevertheless, most of the active nickel must be attached to
> the inner wall of the stainless tube. In addition, at the temperatures
> used, the Ni powder would sinter and not be easily to remove. ****
>
>  ****
>
> As for modifying the stainless using chemical etch, I doubt this would be
> effective.  This texture would have to be active initially and remain
> unchanged at high temperature. Such textures are not stable and would not
> survive the high temperature. Rossi has done something to the Ni powder
> that is very stable and not affected by high temperature.  This fact alone
> greatly reduces the possibilities to anyone familiar with the materials
> science of this material. Rossi is gradually letting the cat out of the
> bag, whether he wants to or not.****
>
>  ****
>
> Ed Storms****
>
> On May 29, 2013, at 8:29 AM, Bob Higgins wrote:****
>
>
>
> ****
>
> I  would like to submit my speculation about the latest Rossi hotCat for
> discussion on Vortex-l.****
>
> ·         We are told that the central reactor core is a 310 stainless
> steel cylinder ( 3cm by 33cm).  There is no port for introduction of H2.
>  The ends are cold welded closed.****
>
> ·         When the test device was sawed open, only a miniscule amount of
> powder came out.  This cannot be the active powder - it would have melted
> as loose powder rather than conveying the heat out of the cylinder.****
>
> ·         It is highly desirable to have high thermal conductivity
> between the NAEs and the outer metal cylinder.  You wouldn't get this with
> loose powder on the inside.****
>
> ·         310 stainless is ~25% chromium, ~21% Ni, and the balance mostly
> iron****
>
> Consider what Celani has done - taken a Ni-Cu alloy wire and etched out
> the Cu to realize the surface nanotexturing, thus creating NAEs on the wire
> outer surface.  Suppose we took the 310 stainless cylinder and used a
> chromium etch on the inner surface.  Chrome etches typically contain nitric
> acid which will also attack the iron, but not the nickel.  The result could
> be a nanotextured Ni inner surface of the 310 SS cylinder with perhaps a
> micro-scale Ni "fur" in *high thermal contact with the cylinder*.  There
> may be further chemical texturing of the inner surface or nanopowder added
> as part of a thermo-chemical modification of the surface to create the NAEs
> in high number on the inner textured Ni surface.****
>
>  ****
>
> Then, cold weld one end of the cylinder closed.  Calculate the amount of
> metal hydride needed to release the desired pressure of H2 into the
> cylinder when it is heated and put this powder inside the cylinder.  Cold
> weld seal the second end closed.  Viola!  You have a hotCat reactor core.*
> ***
>
>  ****
>
> Rossi has also described his "cat and mouse" where the "mouse" was added
> to enhance the performance of the hotCat.  An easy speculation for this
> would be that he could take some of his previous Rossi micro-Ni + catalyst
> powder and add that as well to the hotCat as a means to help the reaction
> begin from a lower temperature.****
>
>  ****
>
> I believe the cylindrical outer heaters are just resistor coils embedded
> in a high thermal conductivity ceramic.****
>
>  ****
>
> Comments?  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>

Reply via email to