On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Alan Fletcher <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: "Joshua Cude" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:12:17 AM > > > And didn't > > the engineers at the Swedish Standards Institute test this > > configuration without success. Have those engineers given an opinion > > on the latest test? They know more than me too. > > They terminated the test because Rossi wasn't using a true RMS meter, > which would under-estimate energy at the low end of the Triac's "dimmer" > waveform. > > Hence the use of the wide-band meter. > > But a large part of the aborted test appeared to be running at full RMS > power, ie NO error, with an on/off duty cycle similar to the current run. > > It's comical that there is quibbling like this about such trivialities with a revolution waiting in the wings. This was the better part of a year ago, and no progress since? How is that possible?
