Cool, this phenom obviously requires a lot of heads from different disciplines to figure it out since it does not appear to follow the straight and narrow from what I see.
On Thursday, May 30, 2013, Eric Walker wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:51 AM, ChemE Stewart > <[email protected]<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '[email protected]');> > > wrote: > > Right, the brethren has so far brought us fission reactors, nuclear bombs >> and hot fu$ion, crowning achievements for our children > > > I should clarify that I was trying to reproduce the inevitable and > circular logic that some people will draw upon in order to respond to the > point Jed made about Elforsk's engineers liking the May 2013 test. I > should also add that I have nothing against physicists; I'm just using a > little rhetorical exaggeration about engineers versus physicists in order > to tendentiously make a point. > > This is in connection with what I wrote here: > > This is, unfortunately, proof of their being out of their depth. They >> would do well to consult their brethren in physics in order to forestall >> their future abasement and to allow them to be led back to the straight and >> narrow. >> > >
