On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:39 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote:
> There are advantages to using a three phase power input that have been > pointed out. > For this application, the disadvantages are greater. > Measurements of 3 phase systems are done every day so this is not > important. > > Of course they are. But everyday measurements do not need to consider the possibility of deliberate deception. 3-phase is more complicated and involves more wires. Increased complexity is a magician's friend. It is so utterly unnecessary, and it has such clear benefits for deception. Like forcing the use of a particular line, and increased opportunity for hidden wires or power, and increased opportunity for more power if you want to make something glow red. > If Cude can show a real test that proves 3 phase measurements are not > accurate, then someone will listen. > I see it differently. True believers insist on an explanation of how deception might explain the alleged observations, but do not hold themselves to the same standard to give an explanation for how NiH could produce 100 times the power density of nuclear fission fuel without melting, let alone explain what kind of a reaction would produce the alleged heat. It doesn't matter if you don't understand the trick in the cheese power video. You are pretty sure it's a trick because the alternative is too implausible. Likewise, some deception is far more likely and plausible in Rossi's ecat than the alternative explanation just based on thermodynamics, and far more so if you consider the nuclear physics.
