Jones,
Interesting concept..[snip] >> No, these are all two body
reactions, because the f/H is bound in a
pico/femto molecule,[/snip] how about combining it with Naudt's paper on
relativistiv hydrogen, the hydrogen has an equivalent negative acceleration
of relativistic proportion from suppression geometry which is breaking the
isotropy into a tapestry of different values..could the covalent bond hold /
oppose the transition to different fractional values within the tapestry
such that it collides with a non fractional or lesser fractional hydrogen
from a temporal angle? It would be a Lorentzian contracted molecule
approaching the normal molecule .. I am questioning if a covalent bond can
drag an inertial frame with it into a different frame and collide on some
relativistic vector that reduces the columb barrier? Time dilation might
gain something but more than that I wonder if the barrier is lower on the
time axis.
Fran
Jones
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=from:%22Jones+Be
ene%22> Beene Sat,
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=date:20130601>
01 Jun 2013 19:35:51 -0700
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
Hi Robin,
>> The H2 is of course f/H molecules.
> Still three body reactions - no way
>> No, these are all two body reactions, because the f/H is bound in a
pico/femto molecule, and approaches the target nucleus as a single
(composite) entity.
What is the separation distance between the two protons? They may be
relatively close, but it is hard to imagine that this is not three body. Why
are spallation neutrons not produced?
