Jones, Did he make the background measure and the active run measure with the detector in the same place and same orientation? If he did, then the dip recorded during the active run would mean an _active_ ecat can reduce background radiation.
Harry On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 12:08 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 1 Jun 2013 19:59:52 -0700: > Hi, > [snip] > >Let me add that in the appendix to the Penon report, David Bianchini finds > >not only "no significant radiation" over background, but actually the peak > >radiation counts are slightly less during the experiment than background, > >indicating the apparatus shields the detector from cosmic rays slightly. > > That wouldn't surprise me if contained a couple of cm of lead shielding. > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >
