If LENR is the result of BECs like Y E Kim's theory predicts, then we will have a relatively straightforward way to set up and capitalise on this fifth state of matter. The other 4 states are Solid, Liquid, Gas, and Plasma. To expect an atom to behave in the same fashion while in one state as it does in the other is obtuse, yet that is what modern physicists insist on when they say that the nuclear fusion branches for plasma are the same as for BECs.
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > *Rydberg excitation of a Bose-Einstein condensate* > > > > Any nuclear reaction that produces a gamma that occurs in a BEC will > undergo frequency reduction based on the super-atom formula > > > > Gamma frequency = Square root (Number of BEC atoms)(Thermalized frequency) > > > > The frequency of the gamma will be shared by N BEC member atoms. > > > > To conclude this discussion with an example, the BEC of positive mirrored > ions in the dipole ensemble can be considered a huge positive particle > effectively a billion times larger than a proton. But this super-positive > particle is only a few nanomenters away from a give nucleus. This short > distance exposes the localized linear volume to the full force of the EMF. > That unfortunate nucleus would experience powerful disruptive EMF charge > amplification which would make the space/time in the local nano-volume that > the nucleus lived in a killing field for the nuclear forces that hold the > nucleus together. > > > > If the BEC is scalable, how powerful can a Entangled Dipole EMF become? I > can’t wait to find out. > > > > Reference: > > > > http://arxiv.org/pdf/1212.0135v1.pdf > > >
