I never understood how Kim's BEC get rid of the gammas.
2013/6/2 Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> > If LENR is the result of BECs like Y E Kim's theory predicts, then we will > have a relatively straightforward way to set up and capitalise on this > fifth state of matter. The other 4 states are Solid, Liquid, Gas, and > Plasma. To expect an atom to behave in the same fashion while in one state > as it does in the other is obtuse, yet that is what modern physicists > insist on when they say that the nuclear fusion branches for plasma are the > same as for BECs. > > On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> *Rydberg excitation of a Bose-Einstein condensate* >> >> >> >> Any nuclear reaction that produces a gamma that occurs in a BEC will >> undergo frequency reduction based on the super-atom formula >> >> >> >> Gamma frequency = Square root (Number of BEC atoms)(Thermalized frequency) >> >> >> >> The frequency of the gamma will be shared by N BEC member atoms. >> >> >> >> To conclude this discussion with an example, the BEC of positive mirrored >> ions in the dipole ensemble can be considered a huge positive particle >> effectively a billion times larger than a proton. But this super-positive >> particle is only a few nanomenters away from a give nucleus. This short >> distance exposes the localized linear volume to the full force of the EMF. >> That unfortunate nucleus would experience powerful disruptive EMF charge >> amplification which would make the space/time in the local nano-volume that >> the nucleus lived in a killing field for the nuclear forces that hold the >> nucleus together. >> >> >> >> If the BEC is scalable, how powerful can a Entangled Dipole EMF become? I >> can’t wait to find out. >> >> >> >> Reference: >> >> >> >> http://arxiv.org/pdf/1212.0135v1.pdf >> >> >> > > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]
