I don't understand what you mean...
2013/6/3 Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> > > > On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> There are theories that avoid the violation of the 2nd law. >> > ***Then as long as those theories can explain this experimental result, > everything is in good shape. Why would you say "That's not good"? > > This is an experimental finding, not a theory. > > > >> >> >> 2013/6/3 Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> >> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> That's not good. It violates the 2nd law of thermo. >>>> >>> ***It is an experimental finding. Like Feynman says, experiment trumps >>> theory. >>> >>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Daniel Rocha - RJ >> danieldi...@gmail.com >> > > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
