Jouni Valkonen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Leading scam hypothesis does assume that Giuseppe Levi is a scammer and he > is as bad as Rossi. And he brought most of the instruments. > I see. And these other co-authors are so stupid they do not even notice the equipment is not working? Even though they calibrated the wattmeter with a resistor? Even though they stepped a blank cell through a calibration? So you are saying Levi wants to destroy his own reputation for no reason, for no possible benefit. Because there is not slightest chance he or Rossi will get away with this. Sooner or later someone will bring an instrument that reveals the scam. Also, how did Rossi and Levi manage to make modern integrated circuit instruments work wrong? That is a remarkable achievement. Did they develop millions of dollars in specialized equipment to manufacture replacement integrated circuits? Because the only thing most people can do with a modern meter is break it. "Most people" including the experts who manufacture these things. There are no serviceable parts in them. Trying to make one function but give the wrong answer would be about as easy as making modern computer CPU hardware malfunction, give the wrong answer, yet keep working. I think this "leading scam hypothesis" is far, far removed from reality. - Jed
