Unfortunately, even though Y E Kim engaged with me in the past, he seems to have chosen not to engage on this particular subject, wherein his theory is given a leg up.
Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> May 27 (10 days ago) to Yeong Hello Dr. Kim: It would seem that your BEC theory has gotten yet another leg up. I realize that this paper was posted more than a year ago, but I just ran across it today on arxiv.org by way of Vortex-L. Could you please let me know your thoughts on this paper, for attribution on the 2 websites we've mentioned in the past. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.1261v1.pdf Thank you, best regards, and Happy Memorial Day Kevin O'Malley *Rydberg excitation of a Bose-Einstein condensate*<http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3024348/posts> *arxiv.org ^<http://www.freerepublic.com/%5Ehttp://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.1261v1.pdf> * | March 2012 | M. Viteau1, M. Bason1, J. Radogostowicz2;3, N. Malossi1;2, O. Morsch1, D. Ciampini1;2;3, and E. Arim Posted on *Monday, May 27, 2013 10:56:04 AM* by *Kevmo *<http://www.freerepublic.com/~kevmo/> Rydberg excitation of a Bose-Einstein condensate http://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.1261v1.pdf We have performed two-photon excitation via the 62P3=2 state to n=50-80 S or D Rydberg state in Bose-Einstein condensates of rubidium atoms. The Rydberg excitation was performed in a quartz cell, where electric fields generated by plates external to the cell created electric charges on the cell walls. Avoiding accumulation of the charges and realizing good control over the applied electric field was obtained when the fields were applied only for a short time, typically a few microseconds. Rydberg excitations of the Bose-Einstein condensates loaded into quasi one-dimensional traps and in optical lattices have been investigated. The results for condensates expanded to different sizes in the one-dimensional trap agree well with the intuitive picture of a chain of Rydberg excitations controlled by the dipole-dipole interaction. The optical lattice applied along the one-dimensional geometry produces localized, collective Rydberg excitations controlled by the nearest-neighbour blockade. PACS numbers: 03.65.Xp, 03.75.Lm ………………… V. CONCLUSIONS We have demonstrated the controlled preparation of Rydberg excitations in large ensembles of ultracold atoms forming structures of localized collective excita- tions, either self-generated by the long-range interactions between Rydberg atoms or imposed by an optical lattice. Our results can straightforwardly be extended to two- and three-dimensional lattice geometries and to even larger lattice spacings that will allow selective Rydberg excitation on a single site. Furthermore, appropriate detection techniques such as microchannel plates should allow direct observation of the distribution of Rydberg excitations in the lattice. Classical and quantum correlations, and highly en- tangled collective states are expected to be created, as pointed out in [42] for one dimensional Rydberg gases and in [43] for one-dimensional optical lattices. Our results pave the way towards their controlled creation. ------------------------------ *TOPICS:* Science <http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/science-chat/index>; *Click to Add Topic* <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3024348/add-topic> *KEYWORDS:* canr <http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/canr/index>; cmns<http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/cmns/index>; coldfusion <http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/coldfusion/index>; lenr<http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/lenr/index>; *Click to Add Keyword*<http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3024348/add-keyword> ------------------------------ <https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate> ------------------------------ ------------------------------ To: *All; y'all; et al* Interesting discussion on Vortex regarding this http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg81294.html On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Edmund Storms wrote: > That is the idea. However, why would only a few hydrons fuse leaving just > enough unreacted hydrons available to carry all the energy without it > producing energetic radiation? I would expect occasionally, many hydrons > would fuse leaving too few unreacted hydrons so that the dissipated energy > would have to be very energetic and easily detected > ***That would account for the very occasional neutron being observed, right? And it also would account for how few of them get observed as well. They only happen when a multiple-fusion event takes place inside the BEC and there isn't enough BEC infrastructure to absorb the energy. > . Also, how is this mass-energy coupled to the unreacted hydrons? The BEC > is not stable at high temperatures, which would be present inside the BEC > when mass-energy was released. I would expect this release would destroy > the BEC, leaving the fused hydrons to dissipate energy by the normal hot > fusion method. > ***I would expect it as well. Like an explosion taking place inside a house, the structure blocks much of the energy while it is momentarily in place. And then another BEC forms, 2 atoms fuse, and the reaction goes on & on. > The concept appears to have many logical flaws. > > Ed Storms > > On May 27, 2013, at 10:08 AM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: > > Then is that an explanation of why Gamma rays are not observed in LENR? > If 2 of the atoms inside a multi-atom BEC fuse together, the incoming > radiation (to the rest of the BEC) gets subdivided based upon how many > atoms have formed the BEC. Right? > > > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Axil Axil wrote: > >> This paper verifies that a photon eradiated Bose-Einstein condensate >> will cut the frequency of incoming photons by dividing that frequency >> between N numbers of atoms. >> >> >> http://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.1261v1.pdf >> >> >> Rydberg excitation of a Bose-Einstein condensate >> >> >> “The results of theoretical simulations are represented by the >> continuous lines. >> >> >> According to the super-atom picture the collective Rabi frequency for the >> coherent excitation of N atoms is >> >> >> frequency (collective) = square root(number of atoms) X >> frequency(single); >> >> >> Where the single-particle Rabi frequency (single) is app 2 pi x 200 kHz >> for our experimental parameters.” >> > > *3* <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3024348/posts?page=3#3>posted on *Monday, May 27, 2013 11:00:17 AM*by *Kevmo *<http://www.freerepublic.com/~kevmo/>("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who) [*Post Reply* <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3024348/reply?c=3> | *Private Reply*<http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/mail-compose?refid=3024348.3;reftype=comment>| *To 2* <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3024348/posts?page=4#2> | *View Replies* <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3024348/replies?c=3> | *Report Abuse* <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3024348/abuse?c=3>]
