In the standard model, E=MC2, and the neutrino account for the Energy and momentum conservation.
The same rules apply for LENR. If something does not add up, just add a new field like the Higgs or the Higgs boson. Or maybe super-symmetric particles might be required. Maybe LENR will require the discovery some new ways to make energy and momentum balance when things don't add up right. On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Harry Veeder <[email protected]> wrote: > Another thing I find puzzling is why Kim appends the phrase "in free > space" to momentum conservation. > I thought conservation of momentum was a universal law, which > means it suppose to apply everywhere under any circumstances. > For example James Clerk Maxwell made sure his theory of > electromagnetism did not violate the conservation of momentum. > > Harry > > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]>wrote: > >> are'nt gamma the way to compensate momentum ? >> and neutron the expected nuclear products? >> >> by the way I appreciate the way yeong kim explain why lattice is not free >> space : >> "even though I clearly recognized that the conventional nuclear >> scattering theory at positive energies cannot directly be applied to >> nuclear reactions involving deuterons bound in a metal, which is a >> negative-energy bound-state problem. Quantum scattering theory describing >> the Coulomb barrier problem is applicable to scattering experiments with >> nuclear beams." >> >> a much more sexy explanation than my microelectronic experience that QM >> in solid is ... strange... ( ;-) ) >> >> >> >> 2013/6/7 Harry Veeder <[email protected]> >> >>> Peter, >>> >>> Kim says Huizenga's three miracles are: >>> (1) suppression of the DD Coulomb repulsion (Gamow factor) * * >>> (2) no production of nuclear products (D+D → n+ 3He, etc.) >>> (3) the violation of the momentum conservation in free space >>> >>> In other places I have seen Huizenga three miracles written like this : >>> (1) the mystery of how the Coulomb barrier is penetrated >>> (2) the lack of strong neutron emissions >>> (3) the lack of strong emission of gamma or x-rays >>> see for example >>> http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/Chubb93Editorial.pdf >>> http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/Theories/LiTheory.shtml#miracles >>> >>> >>> The second set does not mention of violation of momentum conservation >>> in free space. >>> Which set is correct? >>> >>> Harry >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> *Prof. Yeong Kim interviewed*: a veteran finally gets optimistic following >>>> a technological breakthrough. >>>> Please see: >>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/06/a-veterans-voice.html >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>>> Cluj, Romania >>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>>> >>> >>> >> >
