Francis, In this current investigation of LENR it is difficult to understand what is its cause is and what its effects are.
The breakdown of how matter and energy really work may not be a cause of LENR but just one of the many effects of the ultimate cause. What happens when a hydrogen atom enters into a region of space time that is ripped and rended where the usual ratios of the fundamental energy strengths are greatly altered, where the values of the fundamental constants of nature are radically changed? Do the orbits of the electron conform to standard quantum mechanical rules or does this hydrogen atom being deprived of its usual nuclear force ratios and the usual characteristics of normal space change it fundamental real world behavior. If in the localized nanoscopic volume, if the energy ratios are changed where the weak force is combined with the electromagnetic force, how does the atom behave? Even through the agency and application of greater LENR force, if the three of the four fundamental forces of nature are further affected so that the strong force is gravely undermined so that its normal ratio of power is altered to approach unity with the electroweak/electrostatic force; how would the hydrogen atom behave? The makeup of the fundamental forces of nature may be so distorted by EMF concentration, that the nature of matter reflects how the universe was just milliseconds after the start of the “Big Bang” When the community of science fully recognizes what a wonderful research tool that LENR can be, they will explore wonders of nature that are currently out of their limited reach. What discoveries that this LENR tool will provide is not yet fully imagined. If the same processes that occur in the core of a supernova can be produced in a nano-volume that can be controlled from the comfort of their desktop, what can an innovative experimentalist come up with? Can you imagine what these future experimentalists will think of the current deriders of LENR for their disruptive behavior for depriving them of the most powerful tool to uncover the secrets of nature that has ever been discovered? On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Roarty, Francis X <[email protected] > wrote: > On Fri June 7th Axil said [snip] Why does a Ni/H reactor form a > Bose-Einstein condensate throughout its entire volume? STANIS LAW J. SZAREK > provides the answer; the dipoles throughout the reactor are forced to > become totally entangled when the percentage of dipole entanglement exceeds > 20%. [/snip]**** > > Axil, > Does this mean that 20% of the hydrogen must be in a redundant ground > state, F/h? On one hand it seems like the confinement must be small and > conductive to fractionalize but on the other it must reach 20% of the gas > to reach entanglement… I keep going back to a relativistic interpretation > of casimir effect and Naudt’s relativistic explanation of the hydrino to > fit the requisite percentage of atoms into a space that appears too small > from our macro perspective.. My posit is that hydrogen fractions > approaching h/137 see the macro world as slow moving as we see the Paradox > twin orbiting an event horizon.. I chose the equivalent acceleration of the > black holes gravity well instead of near luminal velocity of an object > because it is nearer the situation inside the NAE where fractional > hydrogen acting as a local observer sees itself at the top of a gravity > well where the bottom of the well is the macro world outside the NAE. My > posit is that vacuum engineering at the nano scale via suppression is free > and far easier than modifying the isotropy with velocity or gravity wells > at the macro scale, It is still partially subject to square law but is > trumped by Casimir effect in this geometry – I think there is also some > inherent advantage in “shielding” a zone from longer vacuum wavelengths in > that you are segregating a reservoir that wants to equalize without pouring > any energy into the construction, it sets the stage for us to employ gas as > the mediator between the reservoirs of different potentials present inside > the cavity.. like Rossi’s tubules the geometry should form a tapestry of > different suppression levels. I suspect that f/H2 takes on different values > proportional to the tapestry dimensions where the h atoms first associate. > As these fractional molecules disassociate and quickly reform they migrate > toward a negative minimum of h/137, I can see the 20% threshold being > reached as the gas population in the cavity approaches this minimum and > there also remains the open question if fractional molecules / IRH can > persist for a time outside the geometry in the lattice.**** > > Fran **** > > ** ** > > *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Friday, June 07, 2013 4:31 PM > *To:* vortex-l > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: [Vo]:ENTANGLEMENT THRESHOLDS FOR RANDOM INDUCED > STATES**** > > ** ** > > References:**** > > > http://phys.org/news/2013-05-einstein-spooky-action-common-large.html**** > > > *Einstein's 'spooky action' common in large quantum systems, > mathematicians find***** > > > If you like mathematics that can choke an elephant try this as follows:*** > * > > > http://arxiv.org/pdf/1106.2264v3.pdf**** > > > *ENTANGLEMENT THRESHOLDS FOR RANDOM INDUCED STATES***** > > Why does a Ni/H reactor form a Bose-Einstein condensate throughout its > entire volume? STANIS LAW J. SZAREK provides the answer; the dipoles > throughout the reactor are forced to become totally entangled when the > percentage of dipole entanglement exceeds 20%.**** > > **** > > The Ni/H reactor will formulate a very large entangled system when it is > in operation. As a large system, it has no choice but to become totally > entangled. **** > > > Infrared Photon tunneling between the individual Nano-cavities is the > method by which quantum entanglement is spread Josephson like from one > nano-cavity to its immediate neighbors.**** > > > When the Ni/H reactor is not totally entangled, it renders the nuclear > energy it produces from the decoherent nano-cavities as gamma radiation. > However, if the 20% entanglement threshold is reached, the energy produced > by the LENR reaction is thermalized through the process of frequency > sharing as in a large super atom.**** > > When a Ni/H reactor is not yet totally entangled, it will produce gamma > radiation. This can happen when the reactor is heating up upon startup or > cooling down at shutdown.**** > > In the LeClair reactor, the 20% entanglement threshold is never reached > and a significant proportion of its energy output is rendered as gamma > radiation. **** > > A Ni/H reactor must exceed this 20% dipole entanglement threshold before > its energy production phase is initiated to avoid the inconvenience of > gamma production. **** > > **** >
