Kevin,
A recent citation by Jed
http://coldfusionnow.org/nanoscale-ag-may-decrease-the-radiation-of-cesium-134-and-137-by-lenr-transmutation/
makes an important point regarding your frequency division. Dr. Iwasaki's
report is that he claims to have permanently reduced radioactivity in
contaminated soil and water. He then captured data under better controlled
conditions in the lab and found a decrease in the "half-life" of radioactivity
of these Cesium isotopes to about 1 or 2 months from their normal 2 years and
30 years respectively. This suggests the mechanism for frequency division is
relativistic and that his condensate of Cesium isotopes actually experienced
time dilation . If it were only frequency dividing based on the number of atoms
it would return to normal count when the powder is removed but the report
indicates the effect is permanent on the contaminated water and soil. Suspend
disbelief for a moment and consider relativistic time dilation where we outside
the nano powder appear to be at the foot of a gravity hill in a similar way to
the Paradox twin orbiting an event horizon see us at the top of a hill. Just as
the Twin sees us as greatly accelerated in time from his perspective we see the
isotopes in . Dr. Iwasaki's report as greatly accelerated. My posit is that in
all cases everything appears normal to the local observers and these redundant
states from 1/2 to 1/137 are the result of the geometry on space time. Any
radiation emitted in these modified space time regions will not emerge from the
cavities at their normal frequency, it will be much slower proportional to how
redundant the radioactive gas that emitted it became.. the spectrum shifting
reported by Black Light Power would be in keeping with this conclusion.
Fran
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin O'Malley [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2013 11:47 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:ENTANGLEMENT THRESHOLDS FOR RANDOM INDUCED STATES
On another thread, Edmund Storms posted how many nuclear fusion atoms
must take place to generate 1 Watt of power. We can work backwords
from that number, knowing that a certain number of Watts are
generated. Then we know how many atoms/second are fusing. From that
calculation you can figure out how many OTHER atoms need to be
involved with the BEC in order for it to have the frequency being
observed. I doubt the entire device needs to be involve. I think it
would be hundreds of BECs forming with thousands of atoms.
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg81244.html
This paper verifies that a photon eradiated Bose-Einstein condensate will
cut the frequency of incoming photons by dividing that frequency between N
numbers of atoms.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.1261v1.pdf
On 6/7/13, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
> References:
>
>
> http://phys.org/news/2013-05-einstein-spooky-action-common-large.html
>
>
> *Einstein's 'spooky action' common in large quantum systems, mathematicians
> find*
>
>
> If you like mathematics that can choke an elephant try this as follows:
>
>
> http://arxiv.org/pdf/1106.2264v3.pdf
>
>
> *ENTANGLEMENT THRESHOLDS FOR RANDOM INDUCED STATES*
>
> Why does a Ni/H reactor form a Bose-Einstein condensate throughout its
> entire volume? STANIS LAW J. SZAREK provides the answer; the dipoles
> throughout the reactor are forced to become totally entangled when the
> percentage of dipole entanglement exceeds 20%.
>
>
>
> The Ni/H reactor will formulate a very large entangled system when it is in
> operation. As a large system, it has no choice but to become totally
> entangled.
>
>
> Infrared Photon tunneling between the individual Nano-cavities is the
> method by which quantum entanglement is spread Josephson like from one
> nano-cavity to its immediate neighbors.
>
>
> When the Ni/H reactor is not totally entangled, it renders the nuclear
> energy it produces from the decoherent nano-cavities as gamma radiation.
> However, if the 20% entanglement threshold is reached, the energy produced
> by the LENR reaction is thermalized through the process of frequency
> sharing as in a large super atom.
>
> When a Ni/H reactor is not yet totally entangled, it will produce gamma
> radiation. This can happen when the reactor is heating up upon startup or
> cooling down at shutdown.
>
> In the LeClair reactor, the 20% entanglement threshold is never reached and
> a significant proportion of its energy output is rendered as gamma
> radiation.
>
> A Ni/H reactor must exceed this 20% dipole entanglement threshold before
> its energy production phase is initiated to avoid the inconvenience of
> gamma production.
>
