Early Los Alamos heat pipes contained water or sodium. In the mid-1980s,
Los Alamos developed a lithium heat pipe that transferred heat energy at a
power density of 23 kilowatts per square centimeter—to understand the
intensity of that amount of heat energy, consider that the heat emitted
from the sun's surface is only 6 kilowatts per square centimeter. Lithium
is placed inside a molybdenum pipe, which can operate at white-hot
temperatures approaching 1,477 K (2,200°F). Once heated inside the pipe,
the lithium vaporizes and carries heat down the pipe's length.


On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Rossi would need a container ship to do the same thing. This is not good
> for a utility.
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Someday a 50 to 100 kilowatt lithium based heat tube integrated heat pipe
>> and LERN reaction chamber whose dimensions are an inch in diameter and a
>> foot long made of zirconium. It will be connected to a vapor heat transfer
>> bus to the heat exchanger and serviceable by hot swap out.
>>
>> This heat pipe will stabilize its temperature with a computer settable
>> thermal control valve at the vapor side of the vapor bus connection. The
>> tube should have a SCADA monitoring control connection to a main SCADA
>> computer.
>>
>> A plug and play cubic foot of volume will support 100 such tubes
>> producing (100) (100 kW) of power at 800C.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The heat transfer contact is very good because it is made by quantum
>>> effects caused by the BEC. I believe that the powder is super-fluidic. That
>>> means that the hydrogen gas and the powder and maybe even the containment
>>> tube are the same temperature (exothermic).
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Teslaalset 
>>> <robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Major problem is that it is hot powder than needs to transfer its heat.
>>>> It simply has a bad contact with the heat exchanger.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to