This bit of information ("*E*e ~ 5-10 eV" ) shows that energetic electrons
are not involved in the reaction and therefore undercuts the W&L theory of
low energy neutron formation.


Do you refer to high-voltage, super-focused fields between nanoparticles?

Anopole magnetic fields produce LENR.

*If so, what reactions do they cause?*



A ring like circulation of infrared light forms between nanoparticles



Reference:


http://www.nature.com/srep/2012/121025/srep00771/full/
srep00771.html#supplementary-information

Spontaneous knotting of self-trapped waves

http://phys.org/news/2012-10-beautiful-physics-tying.html

Beautiful physics: Tying knots in light


These references show how light rings can form under special optical
conditions. The theory of anapole magnetic weak force nuclear activation is
predicated on the formation of light rings forming in the hot spots caused
by polariton formation on the edges between nanoparticles

The bottom line for this post, light ring plasmoid formation is possible
that produce monopole like magnetic fields(anapole fields).












On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 3:44 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Axil,
>
> I cannot decipher this.
>
> What is "the Nanoplasmonic theory of LENR"?
>
> Do you refer to high-voltage, super-focused fields between nanoparticles?
> If so, what reactions do they cause?
>
> Please explain how "*E*e ~ 5-10 eV" relates to 'heavy electrons'?
>
> -- Lou Pagnucco
>
> Axil wrote:
> > This experiment does not support W&L
> >
> > This experiment is another A.V. Simakin type experiment.
> >
> > This experiment supports the Nanoplasmonic theory of LENR asserting the
> > creation of dynamic NAEs are formed by the interactions of nanoparticles,
> > specifically within the “hot spots” between nanoparticles.
> >
> > This experiment does not support the W&L theory of heavy electron (*E*e ~
> > 5-10 eV) formation of a neutron outside the nucleus. It does postulate a
> > weak force reaction of a conversion of a deuterium atom into a dineutron
> > through the action of “high electric field strengths”.
> [...]
>
>

Reply via email to