One of the features that LENR demonstrates is the stabilization of unstable
radioactive isotopes.



In the referenced paper, the LENR reaction supported by nanoparticles
stabilized tritium. The production of low energy neutrons will not meet
that required functionality that a viable LENR theory must demonstrate.



This weak force based functionality is a hole in the W&L neutron based
theory.



Anapole EMF can penetrate into the nucleus










On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 4:46 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Axil,
>
> You miscalculate.
>
> A single electron in a current of 5 eV electrons can acquire far more
> energy than 5 eV via collective effects.
>
> As far as anapoles - Maybe.
> But wasn't this just recently (last week) in the physics news?
> It's possibly relevant, but I am skeptical.
>
> -- Lou Pagnucco
>
> Axil wrote:
> > This bit of information ("*E*e ~ 5-10 eV" ) shows that energetic
> electrons
> > are not involved in the reaction and therefore undercuts the W&L theory
> of
> > low energy neutron formation.
> >
> >
> > Do you refer to high-voltage, super-focused fields between nanoparticles?
> >
> > Anopole magnetic fields produce LENR.
> >
> > *If so, what reactions do they cause?*
> >
> >
> >
> > A ring like circulation of infrared light forms between nanoparticles
> >
> >
> >
> > Reference:
> >
> >
> > http://www.nature.com/srep/2012/121025/srep00771/full/
> > srep00771.html#supplementary-information
> >
> > Spontaneous knotting of self-trapped waves
> >
> > http://phys.org/news/2012-10-beautiful-physics-tying.html
> >
> > Beautiful physics: Tying knots in light
> >
> >
> > These references show how light rings can form under special optical
> > conditions. The theory of anapole magnetic weak force nuclear activation
> > is
> > predicated on the formation of light rings forming in the hot spots
> caused
> > by polariton formation on the edges between nanoparticles
> >
> > The bottom line for this post, light ring plasmoid formation is possible
> > that produce monopole like magnetic fields(anapole fields).
> > [...]
>
>
>

Reply via email to