Dear Alain, May I ask you to explain the joke in French too, 32 C here and I am not at the peak of my, let's say, intellectual performances. Thanks Peter
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]>wrote: > Just a cultural point for a French non-academic like me. > > I know the english expression "Bullshit", an insult saying something have > no value. > It seems that in academic world this tem is upgraded to more stylish "Hors > Manure" ? > Or is it a Texan declination of the usual cow product ? > > about frauding the experiment of another researchers, if that is not > "scientific misconduct", what is it ? the worse is that the researchers > could have been accused of having himself committed fraud... > > For the revenge I have made some fast computation, on my own (it seems the > subject is theoretically too controversial to allow jokes). I have the MOST > STUPID PHYSICIST JOKE idea : > > my computation is based on few school-grade computation based on some > Super-Kamiokande papers. > > Assume that you have a solar-like fusion reactor of 1MW at 1.3km from > super-kamiokande, then it will flood the detector with as much events as > the sun itself... > > many question, since there is no evidence that LENR produce neutrinos, > that they have enough energy to trigger super-kamiokande, and that they are > produced with a similar ration from power to flux. > > the 512keV that Rossi (and others) talk about seems linked to a beta+ > decay, which let hope... question is how much neutrino would be produced. > > > ANYWAY IF IT WORK, IT WOULD BE FUN ! > > Peter, could you send the idea to Defkalion, > If they succeed they will get huge media coverage. > > Their defense against science crime is : > - we did nothing, it cannot exist > > Like impaling a skeptics with a pink unicorn. > > > > > > 2013/6/18 Ruby <[email protected]> > >> >> >> What an excellent essay. The account of the second meeting on >> transmuations: >> >> >> "We held the meeting in the local Holiday Inn. Because of the assault >> made by Professor Cotton and his colleagues on the first meeting we thought >> that a more violent one might be made in this meeting and therefore hired a >> deputy from the police department to be present outside the door >> of the meeting in order to quell any attempt by members of the Chemistry >> Department to suppress the presentation of new ideas by violence. The >> papers of the >96 meeting have been published in the Autumn edition of New >> Energy of that year." >> >> Steven Krivit's archive contains the Proceedings of that meeting: >> http://newenergytimes.com/v2/archives/fic/J/JNE1N3.PDF<http://newenergytimes.com/v2/archives/fic/J/JNE1N3.PDF#page=81> >> >> >> >> >> On 6/17/13 5:49 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: >> >> I never asked Bockris about the harassment. He wrote about it here: >> >> http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BockrisJthehistory.pdf >> >> He told me that several other researchers got positive results but were >> afraid to present them. Some of them asked him to present their results as >> his own. I do not think he did. >> >> - Jed >> >> >> >> -- >> Ruby Carat >> [email protected] >> Skype ruby-carat >> www.coldfusionnow.org >> >> > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
