Robin,
Good point, The spark allows DGT to pool their f/h2 further
from the disassociation threshold and then synchronize the release in
packets with the spark where Rossi has to run hotter - actually into the
threshold with a much heavier reliance on the heat sinking to counter the
runaway - The suggestions by axil that the PWM resistive heating might
synchronize plasmons through the reactor wall does appeal to me in that it
would put Rossi's control loop at least on the map with the spark method
while simple heating makes no sense and would not benefit from the wave
shaping. Would the high Q of this geometry necessary to pick up IR thru the
reactor wall still be suitable to broaden the spectrum down into the range
claimed by Black Light? In electronics we normally associate hi Q with
narrow bandwidth which as a subharmonic might be needed to produce any
visible effects on the f/h . I think the widened spectrum is a function of
the fractional value hydrogen but the Plasmon resonance can cause the f/h to
change values more rapidly and to a greater extent
Fran
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 22:50:40 -0700 Robin said "Because the sparks have
enough energy to split Hydrino molecules, whereas the UV
does not. ;>"
In reply to David Roberson's message of Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:08:53 -0400
(EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
>If it in fact does achieve this goal, then is this process not what DGT
needs
>for their device to function properly? Why does the release of energy from
>the reaction not supplement that from their spark system and hence lead to
>additional reactions? Perhaps this does occur and could result in thermal
run
>away of their unit.
Because the sparks have enough energy to split Hydrino molecules, whereas
the UV
does not. ;>
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
