On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 12:46 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > I suspect that most of the people believe in COE which excludes any free > energy from ZPF. Maybe one day someone will come up with proof that ZPF can > be practically utilized, but until that time I will abide by COE.
I have yet to see any refutation of: http://www.earthtech.org/publications/PRDv35_3266.pdf Granted, Puthoff's paper is based on the Bohr model, however, that only simplifies the complexity of the math. My conjecture minimizes entities by stating that the hydrogen atom in a NAE experiences distortion of the orbital field which causes additional drawing of energy from the ZPF. Upon exiting the NAE influence, the electron then radiates the energy upon restoration of the electron orbit to an undistorted state. It's not totally unlike Randell's theory of fractional states. Silly but extremely simple.
