John Milstone <[email protected]> wrote: > > The "wire trick" (simply running a complete second circuit with both > conductors hidden in a single "wire"), uses only the normal A/C voltage > supplied by the mains. >
A wire cannot be hidden. It is not invisible. It is a macroscopic object. Anyone can see it at a glance. As I pointed out several times, the researchers said the measured voltage, meaning they strippped the wires. They would have seen a second conductor. You should address this fact. > I haven't heard any reasonable explanation of why the 3rd-leg of the > 3-phase power in was left in place, even though it appeared to be doing > nothing. > It was attached to the power meter, so if it was doing something that would be measured. > If the testers really were doing their own "surgery" on the power in > lines, why did they leave a supposedly non-functional line attached between > the power outlet and the E-Cat controller? > I do not know but I suppose there is a reason. In any case, it was metered, so there is no chance extra power was surreptitiously added to the cell with this wire. If they weren't doing their own "surgery" . . . > They say they attached the voltmeter and examined the wires themselves. In other words, they say they did their own "surgery." They said this very clearly. You can deny it all you like, but facts are facts. As Randy Wuller says, the only way your claim could be true would be if all seven researchers are conspiring with Rossi. It is not possible they failed to see a wire! If they are conspiring they would have made up the whole story out of whole cloth without actually doing any tests. They would not have included anything confusing, and they would not have left any loose ends, such as the non-functional wire you describe. For that matter, they would have said that Rossi delivered a device and they tested it another location. If this were a lie told by conspirators it could easily be made more convincing than it is. - Jed
