Jack Cole said: "This is easily disproved. Look at the temperature output graph. How does you notion of constant power instead of a 33% duty cycle explain the dips as rises indicative of a 33% duty cycle in the output corresponding with the measured power on cycles."
I'm not saying anything of the sort. What I am saying is that the there was an EXTRA 400 Watts, supplied continuously, in addition to the measured power. Thus, the same 33% duty cycle would vary between 1200 Watts and 400 Watts. Imagine the existing chart, but with the power in line moved UP by 1/3. This makes the power out line look just like a lump of steel, with no signs of "excess" power. I haven't heard any reasonable explanation of why the 3rd-leg of the 3-phase power in was left in place, even though it appeared to be doing nothing. If the testers really were doing their own "surgery" on the power in lines, why did they leave a supposedly non-functional line attached between the power outlet and the E-Cat controller? If they weren't doing their own "surgery", then it would have been trivial to wire the 3rd, supposedly "dead" power line to produce the desired effect.
