quite classic to use LENR as a bashing tool. see that article that claim EmDrive is 21th century cold fusion http://johncostella.wordpress.com/2013/06/16/the-emdrive-the-cold-fusion-of-the-21st-century/ I would like, but I have few hope (unlike LENR which is experimental science, EmDrive is theory based with weak nonreproduced evidences...)
by the way on the same subject, but much more enthusiast http://www.me-sapiens.com/the-e-cat-and-the-emdrive-two-unicorns-that-might-change-the-world-tomorrow/ I track some data on emdrive http://www.scoop.it/t/emdrive in case something emerge... however, hum... more chance than a lottery ticket. 2013/6/25 David Roberson <[email protected]> > I was just reading the July 2013 addition of Scientific American and was > dismayed by a negative reference to cold fusion hidden within one of the > articles. The title of the article is "In Search of a Mind-Reading > Machine" and at the very end of the 5th paragraph is a sentence that > compares the performance of various recognition softwares to cold fusion. > > The comparison suggests that marketers temp people with recognition types > of products that do not work, hence the comparison. I guess that magazine > has no respect for our field just as others have reported many times. One > day they will realize how ignorant they are when these products become > commonplace. Let's hope that the time of reckoning is near. > > Dave >
