about mainstream attacks, see that old 2011 "answers" http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/3799/why-is-cold-fusion-considered-bogus/13734#13734
maybe is it time to update the data. keep calm, and please no theory... if you remove the theory question , LENR is not a problem. evidence are clear... If I continue to hear all theory around, I'll start to deny LENR. ;-) time to make an industry. 2013/6/25 David Roberson <[email protected]> > I was just reading the July 2013 addition of Scientific American and was > dismayed by a negative reference to cold fusion hidden within one of the > articles. The title of the article is "In Search of a Mind-Reading > Machine" and at the very end of the 5th paragraph is a sentence that > compares the performance of various recognition softwares to cold fusion. > > The comparison suggests that marketers temp people with recognition types > of products that do not work, hence the comparison. I guess that magazine > has no respect for our field just as others have reported many times. One > day they will realize how ignorant they are when these products become > commonplace. Let's hope that the time of reckoning is near. > > Dave >
