just found another old "cold fusion is sure bad science" http://www.tech-faq.com/cold-fusion.html
there is an epidemy in google search... 2013/6/25 David Roberson <[email protected]> > I was just reading the July 2013 addition of Scientific American and was > dismayed by a negative reference to cold fusion hidden within one of the > articles. The title of the article is "In Search of a Mind-Reading > Machine" and at the very end of the 5th paragraph is a sentence that > compares the performance of various recognition softwares to cold fusion. > > The comparison suggests that marketers temp people with recognition types > of products that do not work, hence the comparison. I guess that magazine > has no respect for our field just as others have reported many times. One > day they will realize how ignorant they are when these products become > commonplace. Let's hope that the time of reckoning is near. > > Dave >
