On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>wrote: > > However, clarifying it this way implies we have an appropriate definition >> of "hot fusion" that is amenable to distinguishing from cold fusion or >> LENR, or at least limiting its scope. > > > Also, is it hot fusion if you get the normal dd branches with a beam of > deuterons focused on a deuterated palladium thin foil, but with the energy > of the beam at 300 eV instead of in the keV or MeV, i.e., with a greatly > increased cross section (I presume)? It seems like the dramatic increase > in the cross section resulting from the palladium environment needs to be > explained. I am beginning to suspect that what we're calling "cold fusion" > and "hot fusion" are not as distinct as one would like to make them. > > Eric > > Which paper describes the use of 300 eV? Harry
