Nanoplasmonic Induced Transmutation (NIT). The name needs to be generalized to describe all know anomalous nuclear reactions which are outside the purview of orthodox nuclear physics. This should cover lightning reactions, nebular, solar, and the many forms of cavatation.
At this early stage, it is difficult to make such a generalized classification because there are decades of R&D required to verify the implied assertion that Nanoplasmonics underlie all of possible unexplained nuclear reactions. So a good generalized placeholder name that implies nothing should be used until a universal scientific consensus is formed that reflects the physical underpinning of the reaction in its broadest scope. Maybe a honorable name would be the “Fleischmann reaction” to honor the founder of both LENR and Nanoplasmonics. On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Mark Gibbs <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2013/07/15/why-cold-fusion-has-to-die/ > > [mg] >
