Personally I think the phrase "Cold Fusion" describes itself fairly well. When it comes to the way fusion was initially obtained, which is very hot indeed, this alternate, new method of creating fusion is pretty damned cold, no matter which way you go about it. Maybe we should call it "New Fusion", or maybe "Alternative Fusion", but both of those just sound a bit too groovy.
Bob At 03:52 AM 7/15/2013, you wrote:
<http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2013/07/15/why-cold-fusion-has-to-die/>http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2013/07/15/why-cold-fusion-has-to-die/ [mg] No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - <http://www.avg.com>www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.3349 / Virus Database: 3204/6492 - Release Date: 07/15/13
----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.3349 / Virus Database: 3204/6492 - Release Date: 07/15/13
