Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote: Are you ready to sign an NDA? No? No complaints, then. >
You misunderstand. I have no objection to people keeping secrets. I have no objection to an NDA. * BUT if Defkalion wants to keep their results secret, they should not come to a physics conference and make an empty presentation. A presentation without facts or figures is not appropriate for an academic scientific conference. If they want to keep everything secret, they should not be given a time slot at a physics conference. Many people keep their results partly secret. That is fine. As long as you present facts, figures and instrument readings to prove what you reveal, that is acceptable. Manning said "I was told that independent scientists, from respected institutions, who conducted months of third-party testing of DGT’s Hyperion have written a paper. So you can expect to receive such data soon. . . ." I am delighted to hear that. It is a step in the right direction. That would be the ideal thing to present in a conference. They should make no presentations to academic conferences until they have that report ready, and they want to share it. - Jed - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - * I also have no desire to learn anything covered by an NDA, because I have no use for such information, and also because in my experience, things which are kept secret are usually mistakes or foolish nonsense.
