I agree that those reports give no data. The only interesting result is the opinion of Nelson, who having access to the results, got an opinion that it was real, not fraud, and controlled... an informed, confirmed, public opinion by an competent expert...
my vision is that Defkalion is not hoping to convince the deniers... See how is treated Elforsk paper... what DGT is doing is making some noise, and interested people go and see themselves... science will not discover LENR... it is structurally impossible. only business can. 2013/7/20 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > I wrote: > > >> Many people keep their results partly secret. That is fine. As long as >> you present facts, figures and instrument readings to prove what you >> reveal, that is acceptable. >> > > The recent Levi report is a perfect example. It says nothing about the > Rossi cell content. It sheds no light on the nature of the reaction, or any > trade secret. At the same time it is full of rigorous facts and figures > that prove the calorimetry is correct. The paper sets out to prove one > thing about a "black box" test. It succeeds. If Defkalion presents > something like that, I will be thrilled. I do not want to hear anything > that might endanger their intellectual property. There is no need for that. > > What I do not want to hear is 30 minutes of unsubstantiated blather about > their business plans, or statements about "elliptical orbits of electrons > in clusters" without a single reference to a physics textbook or rigorously > theory paper. When you make a formal presentation at a conference, if you > cannot back it up an assertion with facts, or you will not back it up, do > not make it in the first place. Say nothing. > > People at a business conference can talk all they want about their > business plans. That's fine. That would be a different set of rules. > > - Jed > >
