Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> wrote: my vision is that Defkalion is not hoping to convince the deniers... See > how is treated Elforsk paper... >
No one should hope to convince the deniers. My point is that when they give you a time-slot at a physics conference, your job is to convince the audience. If you do not want to do that, you should not make the presentation. Rossi has not attended any conferences. He has not submitted an abstract or asked for a time-slot. He is not playing by those rules. So I cannot criticize him for not presenting information. science will not discover LENR... it is structurally impossible. > Science DID discover LENR. Fleischmann, Pons, Storms, McKubre, Mizuno and the others are scientists. Rossi is more of an engineer, but his work is based on Arata's, and Arata is definitely a scientist. Given the mass of nanoparticles in Mizuno's cell, he has probably caught up with Rossi in power density and temperature, and possibly even control. Rossi is still ahead, but if he does not make use of his advantages quickly they may be gone in a few years. Rossi's position is similar to that of the Wright brothers in 1908, when they were far ahead of others, because they had better data and a deep understanding of the physics of flight. They thought it would take years for other people to catch up, because it took them years to achieve what they had done. They forgot that learning from other people and from patents is much faster than discovering something yourself. Mizuno plans to publish detailed information about his latest cells. (The present paper, which I will upload tomorrow, has some gaps. These are deliberate and temporary.) He will tell others what they need to know to replicate. He always has in the past. Just as Celani did, he will provide sample materials. I have more confidence in his results than I do in Celani's. Other people skilled in the art will be able to replicate. This is the academic science approach. I predict that it will leave Rossi and Defkalion behind. - Jed
