As said before by Jed, this is a full list of theoretical speculations put
one after another one. There no experiments that confirm their speculations.

Did they make any measurements about Rydberg hydrogen? The EM field that
they are claiming should have been measured with precision. Or are they
hiding the proof?

 

The Defkalion theory might be right to explain the excess heat of the
hyperion. But it might be as well something else that produces the extra
energy.

 

I hope the realtime spectrometer they are building with R6 reactor will open
our eyes to what's going on inside.

 

I don't blame Defkalion. They have made tremendous steps in the right
direction, and given a lot of hints to the public.

 

They have the device. If they make theory about how it is working, they
should then also provide the clues of their claimed theory. They did not. No
one else could. Everybody can make theory. Only Defkalion can make the final
proof or rejection.

 

  _____  

From: Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: mardi 30 juillet 2013 22:41
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The recent ICCF18 (Defkcalion Demo)

 

What does proof buy you.

 

When someone tells you something, you can either ignore it or try it out. If
they supply you proof, that just motivates you more to try to replicate it.
If they supply no proof, you may not feel as confident that the thing will
work but you can still try to verify it via experimentation.

 

The function of proof is to just make you feel better that you are not
wasting your time..

 

 

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Arnaud Kodeck <[email protected]>
wrote:

Defkalion is making a lot of claims without proof of what they say.

 

 

  _____  

From: Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: mardi 30 juillet 2013 18:46


To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The recent ICCF18 (Defkcalion Demo)

 

http://coldfusionnow.org/iccf-18-day-5-presentations-and-awards/

 

 <http://coldfusionnow.org/iccf-18-day-5-presentations-and-awards/> ICCF-18
Day 5: Presentations and Awards

 

An excerpt from the reference.

 

 

Theoretical Analysis and Reaction Mechanisms for Experimental Results of
Hydrogen-Nickel Systems presented by Yeong Kim was anticipated because of
his recent collaboration with Defkalion Green Technologies, who beamed in a
video of their demonstration of the R-5 reactor in Milan on Tuesday.

 

The Hyperion reactor contains a core of nickel metal foam. Heating the
system to 180 C - 849 C, the Hyperion is then triggered, after which the
magnetic field rose 0.6 to 1.6 Tesla.

 

Kim says, "This indicates that LENRs are producing very strong electric
fields E, currents I, and magnetic fields B."

 

ICCF-18fKim reported Defkalion tests produced excess heat only with the even
isotopes of Ni (58, 60, 62, and 64), whereas odd isotopes do not produce
excess heat (61).

 

No gammas outside of 50 keV to 300 keV were detected from the Hyperion. 

 

Graphs were shown of an excess heat run, and a control run, where the data
showed the power can be cut-off at will, revealing the ability to control
the reaction.

 

Kim then began to describe his theoretical explanation of the data. He
speculated that in the Fleischmann-Pons Effect (FPE), two deuterons making a
Helium-4 require a symmetric release of energy, to conserve total momentum.

 

For two-particles exiting the reaction, his model shows lower probability.

 

"The problem is solved", says Kim, and he is willing to talk to other
theorists to help convince them.

 

He then described Boson Cluster-State Nuclear Fusion (BCSNF) generalized to
include Hydrogen-Metal Systems. While there are still some unknowns, namely
the S-factor representing the nuclear force strength, and the probability of
the Boson Cluster State (BCS), the predicted reaction rates can be compared
with the experimental reaction rates.

 

Kim speculated that the magnetic fields generated by the triggering could
provide magnetic alignments of Nickel atoms, and these could provide
localized magnetic trap (LMT) potentials for Boson clusters on the surface
of Ni powders, though these traps have short lifetimes.

 

It is Rydberg atoms that then form the BEC cluster state.

 

"H and Ni powders triggered by glow discharge created a magnetic field
causing Rydberg states allowing nano-scale localized magnetic traps,
allowing Hydrogen Boson Cluster States in the LMT on the Ni surfaces. Fusion
between these elements create excess heat and locally produced glow
discharges."

 

Kim writes, "Transmutation reactions involving Ni isotopes may not be
dominant reaction mechanism but could be part of much weaker secondary
reaction."

 

Kim believes that self-sustaining reactions could be improved by increasing
the deuterium density, and this will be tested with Hyperion R-6 reactor
with the on-line real-time mass spectrometer at Defkalion Lab. 

 

1% of Defkalion revenue will be spent on basic scientific research. Moving
forward, Defkalion will be cooperating with National Instruments, as well.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------

 

IMHO, Boson Cluster-State Nuclear Fusion (BCSNF) is a Nanoplasmonic process.

 

I do not agree with Kim that BEC is the primary LENR mechanism. It is
instead a epiphenomenon (plural - epiphenomena) or a secondary phenomenon
that occurs alongside or in parallel to a primary phenomenon.

 

An epiphenomenon can be an effect of primary phenomena, but cannot affect a
primary phenomenon.

 

In the field of complex systems, the term epiphenomenon tends to be used
interchangeably with "emergent effect".

 

----------------------------------------------------

 

In the E-cat, the polariton formation process allows for the formation of
EMF solitons as separate unconnected units at low temperatures. 

 

As the temperature rises, polariton formation of global polariton
Bose-Einstein condensation appears as an epiphenomenon. This BEC will
thermalize the gamma radiation via a superatom mechanism.

 

See

 

Spasers explained

 

http://www.phy-astr.gsu.edu/stockman/data/Spaser_Chapter.pdf

 

 

 

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Arnaud Kodeck <[email protected]>
wrote:

Axil,

 

Where can I find the presentation of Kim at ICCF18?

 

  _____  

From: Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: mardi 30 juillet 2013 16:38
To: vortex-l


Subject: Re: [Vo]:The recent ICCF18 (Defkcalion Demo)

 

Defkelion has mentioned nanoplasmonics in their ICCF-18 via Kim this year.
You best begin your study of this area of scienceto understand LENR.

 

 

Reply via email to