On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:
> To put things into perspective, the Curie point and not the Debye > temperature of nickel seems to be the most important parameter for gain in > Ni-H. > OK, so now we have: Nickel nanomagnetic scale (sub 10nm) particles heated at least to Ni's Debye temperature, if not its Curie point, and infused with hydrogen -- the mixture being triggered to a NAE by ionizing the hydrogen. Areas of clarification needed: - Should "hydrogen" read "protium (ie: Hydrogen-1)"? - Should there be some characteristic of the ionizing energy specified so that the "infused" "hydrogen" is properly ionized? On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:20 AM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Erratum: Debay -> Debye >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Nickel nanoparticles heated to Ni's Debay temperature and infused with >>> hydrogen -- the mixture being triggered to a NAE by ionizing the hydrogen. >>> >>> Areas of clarification needed:... >>> >>> - Is there a technical name that can be given to the geometry of the >>> "nanoparticles" that would, for example, tell us where in the "nano" >>> range >>> the size of these particles should sit? >>> >>> "Nanomagnetic scale" (sub 10nm) is a term that may qualify. > > See pages 14-16 of: > > http://ecatsite.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/energy-localization-no8-11_n3.pdf > >
