*The magnetic nature of nickel would interfere with the production of nano-vortex anapole fields.*
* * * * *The ability of nickel to affect nano-magnetism must be removed by getting nickel above the Curie temperature.* * * * * * * *Dipole oscillations are the powerhouse that feeds energy into vortex current production. The stronger the Dipole oscillations become, the stronger that the vortex currents will become.* * * * * *Through the application of heat, the nickel micro particles power the LENR process through stimulating Dipole oscillations. This heat energy is transferred to the dipoles most efficiently at or above the Debye temperature.* * * * * *Also, 137C is the blackbody resonant frequency for micro-particles at about 6 microns. * * * * * * * *I bet when Defkalion and Rossi add the nanowire covering to the 5 micron nickel micro-powder, the size of those processed particles will be ideal for a 137C blackbody resonance.* On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:28 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > Does that favor the Debye temperature or Curie point view of the NAE? > > Given your prior posting of this video: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqFc4wriBvE > > It would seem to point to the Debye temperature. > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> *At the heart of the Nanoplasmonic theory of LENR, hot spots produce >> nano-sized magnetic vortexes that disrupt nuclear structure.* >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:29 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> To put things into perspective, the Curie point and not the Debye >>>> temperature of nickel seems to be the most important parameter for gain in >>>> Ni-H. >>>> >>> OK, so now we have: >>> >>> Nickel nanomagnetic scale (sub 10nm) particles heated at least to Ni's >>> Debye temperature, if not its Curie point, and infused with hydrogen -- the >>> mixture being triggered to a NAE by ionizing the hydrogen. >>> >>> Areas of clarification needed: >>> >>> - Should "hydrogen" read "protium (ie: Hydrogen-1)"? >>> - Should there be some characteristic of the ionizing energy >>> specified so that the "infused" "hydrogen" is properly ionized? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:20 AM, James Bowery <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Erratum: Debay -> Debye >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Nickel nanoparticles heated to Ni's Debay temperature and infused >>>>>> with hydrogen -- the mixture being triggered to a NAE by ionizing the >>>>>> hydrogen. >>>>>> >>>>>> Areas of clarification needed:... >>>>>> >>>>>> - Is there a technical name that can be given to the geometry of >>>>>> the "nanoparticles" that would, for example, tell us where in the >>>>>> "nano" >>>>>> range the size of these particles should sit? >>>>>> >>>>>> "Nanomagnetic scale" (sub 10nm) is a term that may qualify. >>>> >>>> See pages 14-16 of: >>>> >>>> http://ecatsite.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/energy-localization-no8-11_n3.pdf >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
