The thermalization of nuclear energy release is conditional. Proton-21 produces gammas up to 10 MeV but that process also uses vortex current to disrupt the nucleus.
Bose Einstein condensation (BEC) thermalizes gamma level energy through a coherent and entangled superatom mechanism. I do not agree with Dr. Kim that BEC is the primary LENR mechanism. It is instead a epiphenomenon (plural - epiphenomena) or a secondary phenomenon that occurs alongside or in parallel to a primary phenomenon. An epiphenomenon can be an effect of primary phenomena, but cannot affect a primary phenomenon. In the field of complex systems, the term epiphenomenon tends to be used interchangeably with "emergent effect". In the E-cat, the polariton formation process allows for the formation of EMF solutions (vortex current) as separate unconnected units at low temperatures. As the temperature rises, polariton formation of global polariton Bose-Einstein condensation appears as an epiphenomenon. This BEC will thermalize the gamma radiation via a superatom mechanism. On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:01 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > What is the reaction resulting from this disruption of nuclear processes? > Does this reaction release energy slowly enough to overcome Roberson's > critique of the nanomagnetic-scale hypothesis of particle-size as being > subject to melting by even a single fusion event? > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> *In its simplest expression, what the Ni/H reactor does is convert heat >> to a special form of magnetism that disrupts nuclear processes. * >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> *The magnetic nature of nickel would interfere with the production of >>> nano-vortex anapole fields.* >>> >>> * * >>> >>> * * >>> >>> *The ability of nickel to affect nano-magnetism must be removed by >>> getting nickel above the Curie temperature.* >>> >>> * * >>> >>> * * >>> >>> * * >>> >>> *Dipole oscillations are the powerhouse that feeds energy into vortex >>> current production. The stronger the Dipole oscillations become, the >>> stronger that the vortex currents will become.* >>> >>> * * >>> >>> * * >>> >>> *Through the application of heat, the nickel micro particles power the >>> LENR process through stimulating Dipole oscillations. This heat energy >>> is transferred to the dipoles most efficiently at or above the Debye >>> temperature.* >>> >>> * * >>> >>> * * >>> >>> *Also, 137C is the blackbody resonant frequency for micro-particles at >>> about 6 microns. * >>> >>> * * >>> >>> * * >>> >>> * * >>> >>> *I bet when Defkalion and Rossi add the nanowire covering to the 5 >>> micron nickel micro-powder, the size of those processed particles will be >>> ideal for a 137C blackbody resonance.* >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:28 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Does that favor the Debye temperature or Curie point view of the NAE? >>>> >>>> Given your prior posting of this video: >>>> >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqFc4wriBvE >>>> >>>> It would seem to point to the Debye temperature. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> *At the heart of the Nanoplasmonic theory of LENR, hot spots produce >>>>> nano-sized magnetic vortexes that disrupt nuclear structure.* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:29 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> To put things into perspective, the Curie point and not the Debye >>>>>>> temperature of nickel seems to be the most important parameter for gain >>>>>>> in >>>>>>> Ni-H. >>>>>>> >>>>>> OK, so now we have: >>>>>> >>>>>> Nickel nanomagnetic scale (sub 10nm) particles heated at least to >>>>>> Ni's Debye temperature, if not its Curie point, and infused with hydrogen >>>>>> -- the mixture being triggered to a NAE by ionizing the hydrogen. >>>>>> >>>>>> Areas of clarification needed: >>>>>> >>>>>> - Should "hydrogen" read "protium (ie: Hydrogen-1)"? >>>>>> - Should there be some characteristic of the ionizing energy >>>>>> specified so that the "infused" "hydrogen" is properly ionized? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:20 AM, James Bowery <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Erratum: Debay -> Debye >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, James Bowery >>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nickel nanoparticles heated to Ni's Debay temperature and infused >>>>>>>>> with hydrogen -- the mixture being triggered to a NAE by ionizing the >>>>>>>>> hydrogen. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Areas of clarification needed:... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - Is there a technical name that can be given to the geometry >>>>>>>>> of the "nanoparticles" that would, for example, tell us where in >>>>>>>>> the "nano" >>>>>>>>> range the size of these particles should sit? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Nanomagnetic scale" (sub 10nm) is a term that may qualify. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> See pages 14-16 of: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://ecatsite.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/energy-localization-no8-11_n3.pdf >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
