We here at vortex have publically disclosed and discussed many of these concepts (i.e. Rydberg matter, inverted Rydberg matter and clustering) as applied to LENR that have been reveled in this patent back as early as 2010 and 2011. To my knowledge we were the first do so.
Does that effect prior art as pursuant to the newly defined US patent law? On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Chuck Sites <[email protected]> wrote: > First a warning, , If your trying to build an cold fusion device for > profit via patents you may want to skip this article. Otherwise you will > have first hand knowledge of prior art. > > If you curious like me and just want to understand how things work, then > this is probably an interesting read. > > I stumbled on this link from some chain of discussion that was occurring > when the Defkalion demonstration was running, and someone mentioned that > there was a patent already on the device. This is a international patent > issued by WIPO to Pekka Soininen for a device described as a > "THERMAL-ENERGY PRODUCING SYSTEM AND METHOD". It looks exactly like the > Defkalion reactor, down to the spark plugs, the metal hydrides and the > Rydberg atoms. > > International Publication Number WO 2013/076378 A2. > > http://www.roxit.ax/FinsktLENRpatent.pdf > > I would think that if Rosi and Defkalion are not currently holding patents > on their technology, this could be very disruptive towards their business > plans. Also, does any know who Pekka Soininen is. He seems to be a new > name in the LENR field (at least to me). > > Best regards > > > > > > >
