On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:59 AM, DJ Cravens <djcrav...@hotmail.com> wrote:
I find it interesting that they do not mention the role of Deuterium. > So p+d and d+d systems might be outside of their claims if it is required. > Earlier discussions here raised the point that patent applications would do well to omit anything related to theory and just focus on a device that someone skilled in the art can reproduce. Would a deuterium requirement (e.g., as an impurity in normal hydrogen) be sufficient to invalidate a patent application that only referred to plain old hydrogen? Eric
