Testing. What both builders of the Ni/H reactor have done is to find the proper pulse rate for the plasma creation reaction through trial and error testing.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:29 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > Axil, > > You discuss the destruction and reformation of NAE over a finite period > of time. Do you think that there is some negative feedback mechanism in > effect which forces the new formations to match the old ones that have been > destroyed? It seems logical that a process that does not have a direct > connection between production and destruction of NAE would proceed to > either thermal run away or ultimate cool down. > > I suppose that a process might originate where elevated temperature > results in that destruction being enhanced, particularly in the hot spots. > The question is: What keeps the process in balance according to your > hypothesis? > > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Tue, Aug 20, 2013 10:23 am > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: about the Nuclear Active Environment > > LENR is driven by a specific topology that directs electrons into the > special motions and concentrations which result in the LENR reaction. > > > Cracks are a good example of this topology in that through the > discontinuity of the lattice that a crack provides, dipole motion meets a > boundary condition that forces electrons to follow a circular path as a > vortex electron currents forms. > > This dislocation of dipole motion must occur at the surface of a metal > at the boundary between the metal a dielectric isolator. > > > The downside of a permanent lattice structure like a crack is that it > will deteriorate over time due to the stresses placed on its topology as > nuclear reactions occur in and around this boundary location. > > > The crack will erode over time and the special conditions that cause the > electrons to behave in this special way will no longer be preserved over > extended time. > > > But discontinuities in dipole movement will also occur between > nano-particles and micro particles. > > > These discontinuities will be continually reformed and dispersed in a > dynamic process as the particles float and bump around in the turbulent > motion of a hot hydrogen atmosphere. > > > These nanoparticles will also be destroyed by nuclear activity, but that > can be occasionally rebuilt out of the condensation process after the > plasma stage produced by a hot heater element or a spark discharge. > > > In this way, the NAE, is continually rebuilt at a fixed rate that > exactly counters the rate of destruction caused in these particles by > nuclear activity. > > > The effective LENR reaction is a fluid process of continual destruction > and renewal that any solid structure cannot duplicate. > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Edmund Storms <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Terry, the problem is psychological, not scientific. Understanding CF >> requires a change in perspective, which is hard for many people to do. You >> need to look at the system in which the nuclear reaction occurs from the >> perspective of the assembly of atoms, i.e. like a chemist does. The >> chemical system os constructed by interaction of the electrons and this >> interaction has very clear rules. Any change required to initiate a nuclear >> reaction will be communicated to this assembly and cause changes before the >> change will be experienced by the nucleus. That process provides the basic >> limitation to any mechanism proposed to occur in the lattice itself. In >> other words, to cause a nuclear effect, the chemical structure will also be >> affected in ways that will stop the nuclear process. This is how a chemical >> system is known to behave based on centuries of experience by chemists and >> by examining material over geological time. A change in perspective is >> REQUIRED before a person can fully appreciate the role of the chemical >> system. That is why a condition must be created outside of the rules that >> apply to the chemical system. The region INSIDE a crack provides this >> environment. Events occurring in this region would not affect or be >> affected by the chemical structure, hence could form a condition able to >> initiate a nuclear reaction. This is a very basic insight that cannot be >> "falsified" in the usual way. It requires a change in perspective to be >> evaluated. >> >> This situation is similar to how the relationship between the Sun and >> Earth was once explained, A change in perspective was required before the >> correct analysis could be done. Before this change in perspective occurred, >> very convincing mathematical analysis showed that the Sun circled the >> Earth, as was obvious to any casual observer. The tools available at the >> time could not falsify this concept. >> >> Ed >> >> >> >> >> On Aug 20, 2013, at 7:02 AM, Terry Blanton wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Sunil Shah <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Ed, >>>> >>>> A long time ago, in Solid State Physics, I read about various types of >>>> Dislocations in crystals (grains). Are they the NAEs? They move with >>>> applied/internal stress/pressure. >>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Dislocation<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dislocation> >>>> >>> >>> Wikipedia has a good article on defects in crystals: >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Crystallographic_defect<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystallographic_defect> >>> >>> But many think that no defect is required in the crystal structure for >>> LENR. >>> >>> There are strong arguments for both but, as yet, I have not seen one >>> that was demonstrably falsifiable with today's tools and technology. >>> >>> >> >
