E vs. temp was not done at the demo.
However below are some typical (average) values from some old lab runs.
I did not "calibrate" at the demo. I only showed that the sample was warmer
than the control. That was the only point that was attempted there so there was
no claim of amount of energy but it was around 4 watts. I did not want to
confuse things and there was no time to calibrate. Just one sphere was hotter
than its environment- that was it.
The important point is that excess increases with temperature.
You may want wait till the next issue of IE comes out to see some empirical
models (Letts, in #112) for better data. Letts has fitted hundreds of data
sets.
temp C
excess W
292
0.2
312
0.6
332
1.2
352
3.9
372
6.2
397
7.1
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Cravens report on NI Week demo
From: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 16:00:27 -0400
It is not clear how any form of energy gain is associated with this experiment.
The demonstration appears to generate LENR energy, but the input function is
not present. It would be educational to have a plot of energy generation
versus temperature.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Jones Beene <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Fri, Sep 20, 2013 3:53 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Cravens report on NI Week demo
-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Blanton
Jed Rothwell wrote:
> http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/NIWeekCravens.pdf
>> Such a simple, magnificent demonstration. "Can you make me a charger
for my Tesla car?" Charming.
Indeed it is - and understated since the hot sphere transfers heat to the
bed and to the control - so the actual gain is more than it appears.
... hey, Terry - are you the proud owner of a Tesla (or just wishing you
were)?
