Thanks for clearing that up. I was wondering how to compare this list of numbers with the observation at the conference. This result makes me curious as to whether or not the device reaches thermal run away at some drive temperature. Perhaps the components you have chosen tend to fall apart before the required drive temperature is achieved.
This demonstration should make an impact upon those who witness it provided they believe that it runs for the extended time you mention. Is there any chance that you can construct one that hold together thermally until run away begins? I suspect that the magnetic source powder would fail before that temperature is reached. In that case, would a large external field perform the required task? Dave -----Original Message----- From: DJ Cravens <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, Sep 20, 2013 5:55 pm Subject: RE: [Vo]:Cravens report on NI Week demo oops you are right K I convert them over as I was doing some kinetic fits. Sorry From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Vo]:Cravens report on NI Week demo Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 23:51:13 +0200 Aren’t thetemperatures below in K instead °C? I’m pretty sure the water bath wasn’tat 397°C … neither 292°C From:DJ Cravens [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: vendredi 20 septembre 201323:14 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Vo]:Cravens reporton NI Week demo E vs. temp was not done at thedemo. However below are some typical (average) values from some old lab runs. I did not "calibrate" at the demo. I only showed that thesample was warmer than the control. That was the only point that was attemptedthere so there was no claim of amount of energy but it was around 4watts. I did not want to confuse things and there was no time tocalibrate. Just one sphere was hotter than its environment- that was it. The important point is that excess increases with temperature. You may want wait till the next issue of IE comes out to see someempirical models (Letts, in #112) for better data. Letts has fittedhundreds of data sets. temp C excess W 292 0.2 312 0.6 332 1.2 352 3.9 372 6.2 397 7.1 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Cravens report on NI Week demo From: [email protected] Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 16:00:27 -0400 It isnot clear how any form of energy gain is associated with thisexperiment. The demonstration appears to generate LENR energy,but the input function is not present. It would be educational to have aplot of energy generation versus temperature. Dave -----OriginalMessage----- From: Jones Beene <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, Sep 20, 2013 3:53 pm Subject: RE: [Vo]:Cravens report on NI Week demo -----Original Message----- From: Terry Blanton Jed Rothwell wrote: > http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/NIWeekCravens.pdf >> Such a simple, magnificent demonstration. "Can you make me a charger for my Tesla car?" Charming. Indeed it is - and understated since the hot sphere transfers heat to the bed and to the control - so the actual gain is more than it appears. ... hey, Terry - are you the proud owner of a Tesla (or just wishing you were)?
